Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2022 145 • KG SZ BEK 2022 145 Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's Seizure of Hair Sample Appeal

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 145
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a prosecutor's decision ordering the seizure of a hair sample from the accused as part of a criminal investigation. The court considered whether the measure was justified under the law, balancing the need for evidence gathering against the individual's fundamental rights. The reasoning affirmed the proportionality and necessity of the seizure, concluding that the procedural requirements for compelling evidence acquisition were met to advance the ongoing criminal prosecution.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's Seizure of Hair Sample Appeal: The court considered whether the measure was justified under the law, balancing the need for evidence gathering against the individual's fundamental rights. The reasoning affirmed the proportionality and necessity of the seizure, concluding that the procedural requirements for compelling evidence acquisition were met to advance the ongoing criminal prosecution.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sequestro di mezzi di prova azione penale diritti procedurali gravi motivi diritti fondamentali decisione motivata Entnahme einer Haarprobe | Zwangsmassnahmen/übrige Zwangsmassnahmen
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 27. Dezember 2022 \n BEK 2022 145 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Entnahme einer Haarprobe |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 29. September 2022, SU 2022 7794);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: