Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 133 • KG SZ BEK 2022 133 Generato dall'IA

Warrant Validity and Evidence Admissibility Appeal

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 133
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a prosecutor's decision to admit evidence obtained during a search warrant execution, arguing the underlying grounds for the warrant were invalid. The court reviewed the prosecutor's decision regarding the admissibility of evidence, focusing on whether the initial basis for the search warrant provided sufficient grounds to proceed with the search that yielded the evidence in question. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision, implicitly finding that the initial justification for the search warrant was legally sound, thereby rendering the subsequently obtained evidence admissible.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 435 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO; Warrant Validity and Evidence Admissibility Appeal: The court reviewed the prosecutor's decision regarding the admissibility of evidence, focusing on whether the initial basis for the search warrant provided sufficient grounds to proceed with the search that yielded the evidence in question. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision, implicitly finding that the initial justification for the search warrant was legally sound, thereby rendering the subsequently obtained evidence admissible.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
mandato di perquisizione motivi probatori motivo di revisione esame delle censure formali impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio sentenze sulla validità di un atto Verwertbarkeit von Beweisen | Untersuchungsführung

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 435 Abs. 1 StPO
The court used this provision to dismiss the appeal.
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision was cited in the context of the procedural basis for the final decision.
Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision was cited to rule on the costs associated with the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 52
Defendant Appeal of Evidence Admissibility Ruling
BEK 2020 90
Prosecutor's Evidence Seizure Upheld on Appeal
BEK 2022 72
Appeal Regarding Warrantless House Search Justification
BEK 2020 4
Challenge to Validity of Search Warrant Due to Insufficient Grounds
BEK 2018 70
Partial Dismissal of Appeal Against Search Warrant Due to Lack of Standing, but Warrant Upheld on Merits

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 435 Abs. 1 StPO

The court used this provision to dismiss the appeal.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision was cited in the context of the procedural basis for the final decision.

Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision was cited to rule on the costs associated with the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 22. Mai 2023 \n BEK 2022 133 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Verwertbarkeit von Beweisen |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 23. August 2022, SU 2020 11);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: