Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2022 127 • KG SZ BEK 2022 127 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Termination of Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 127
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved a complaint by several private parties challenging the decision of the public prosecutor's office to discontinue criminal proceedings. The court considered the appeal against the prosecutor's decision to terminate the investigation into the matter. The court reached its conclusion based on the facts presented and its reasoning regarding the discontinuation of the criminal proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 340 StPO, Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO; Appeal Against Termination of Criminal Proceedings: The court considered the appeal against the prosecutor's decision to terminate the investigation into the matter. The court reached its conclusion based on the facts presented and its reasoning regarding the discontinuation of the criminal proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
stralcio del procedimento denuncia penale ricusazione del pubblico ministero opposizione azione in revoca decisione incidentale impugnabile Einstellung Strafverfahren | Staatsanwaltschaft

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 340 StPO

The appeal was dismissed based on this article.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

This article governs the procedure for deciding on the appeal.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

This article was the basis for the allocation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 21. Dezember 2022 \n BEK 2022 127 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, 3. C.________, 4. D.________, 5. E.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin F.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt G.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 9. August 2022, SU 2021 6577);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: