Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 126 • KG SZ BEK 2022 126 Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. Creditor (Bankruptcy Limitation Defense Procedural Bar)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 126
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a lower court's decision to open bankruptcy proceedings against them, arguing that the initial claim, which formed the basis for the petition, was time-barred under the statute of limitations. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the statute of limitations defense must be raised by the debtor in the initial proceedings concerning the payment claim; since the defense was not raised during the first instance decision regarding the bankruptcy petition, the court reviewing the appeal on the bankruptcy order was not obliged to consider the time-bar defense, as the appeal concerned the regularity of the bankruptcy procedure itself rather than the substantive validity of the underlying claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. Creditor (Bankruptcy Limitation Defense Procedural Bar): The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the statute of limitations defense must be raised by the debtor in the initial proceedings concerning the payment claim; since the defense was not raised during the first instance decision regarding the bankruptcy petition, the court reviewing the appeal on the bankruptcy order was not obliged to consider the time-bar defense, as the appeal concerned the regularity of the bankruptcy procedure itself rather than the substantive validity of the underlying claim.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura di fallimento intervenuta prescrizione limiti procedurali impedimento processuale opposizione tardiva apertura della procedura Konkurseröffnung | Küssnacht ER SchKG/Liq.-Sachen
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 39
Appeal of Bankruptcy Commencement Based on Time-Barred Debt
BEK 2020 74
Appeal Challenging Bankruptcy Order Based on Underlying Debt Dispute
BEK 2025 105
Appeal Regarding Justification for Bankruptcy Proceedings Despite Acknowledged Debt
BEK 2022 89
Appeal Regarding Initiation of Bankruptcy Proceedings Based on Undisputed Debt
BEK 2018 100
Appeal of Bankruptcy Order Based on Disputed Debt

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 3. Oktober 2022 \n BEK 2022 126 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Konkurseröffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Küssnacht vom 11. August 2022, ZES 2022 74);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: