Private Association v. Public Prosecutor (Criminal Proceedings Dismissal)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA private association appealed the public prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings against an accused individual, concerning the dismissal of a criminal investigation file. The court upheld the prosecutor's decision to drop the charges, reasoning that the evidence presented did not sufficiently substantiate the alleged criminal offenses to warrant proceeding with a formal trial, thereby affirming the discretionary power of the prosecution to terminate proceedings when probable cause is lacking.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 385 Abs. 1 BStP, Art. 426 Abs. 1 BStP, Art. 426 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 422 Abs. 4 BStP; Private Association v. Public Prosecutor (Criminal Proceedings Dismissal): The court upheld the prosecutor's decision to drop the charges, reasoning that the evidence presented did not sufficiently substantiate the alleged criminal offenses to warrant proceeding with a formal trial, thereby affirming the discretionary power of the prosecution to terminate proceedings when probable cause is lacking.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appeal is dismissed based on this provision.
The private prosecutor is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal procedure.
The private prosecutor is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the accused.
Testo completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 13. Dezember 2022 \n BEK 2022 122 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n Verein \"A.________\", Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 4. August 2022, SU 2021 9150);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: