Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 121 • KG SZ BEK 2022 121 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 121
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private party appealed a public prosecutor's decision not to initiate criminal proceedings concerning an unknown perpetrator. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant had not presented any new facts or evidence that would justify overturning the prosecutor's determination that the reported events did not constitute a criminal offense warranting investigation or prosecution.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant had not presented any new facts or evidence that would justify overturning the prosecutor's determination that the reported events did not constitute a criminal offense warranting investigation or prosecution.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale privata omissione del ministero pubblico inchiesta penale decisione di non sollevare obiezioni margine d'apprezzamento del ministero pubblico fatti nuovi e nuove prove Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren | Staatsanwaltschaft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 182
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2024 8
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2021 177
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings Dismissed
BEK 2019 188
Private Appeal of Prosecutorial Decision Not to Commence Proceedings
BEK 2022 183
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 19. April 2023 \n BEK 2022 121 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. unbekannte Täterschaft, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. August 2022, SU 2022 303);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: