Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 120 • KG SZ BEK 2022 120 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Ruling

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 120
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company filed an appeal against a decision by the lower supervisory authority concerning debt enforcement matters, specifically challenging a ruling by the Debt Enforcement Office. The appellate court considered the appeal regarding the debt enforcement proceedings, ultimately reviewing the lower supervisory authority's decision which itself was an appeal against the action taken by the Debt Enforcement Office.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Ruling: The appellate court considered the appeal regarding the debt enforcement proceedings, ultimately reviewing the lower supervisory authority's decision which itself was an appeal against the action taken by the Debt Enforcement Office.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
organo dell'esecuzione forzata decisione d'esecuzione ricorso del personale moratoria concordataria insolvenza legittimazione a ricorrere SchKG-Beschwerde | Höfe unt. SchKG Aufsicht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 13
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Proceedings Decision
BEK 2020 95
Appeal Regarding Supervisory Decision in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
BEK 2020 202
Appeal of Debt Enforcement Order
BEK 2021 195
Appeal in Debt Enforcement Procedure Challenge
BEK 2022 57
Appeal of Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Order

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 7. September 2022 \n BEK 2022 120 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann, LL.M. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Betreibungsamt Höfe, Roosstrasse 3, 8832 Wollerau, Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n SchKG-Beschwerde |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung vom 2. August 2022 der Vizegerichtspräsidentin des Bezirksgerichts Höfe als untere Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibungsund Konkurssachen, APD 2022 15);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin \n als Vizepräsidentin der oberen kantonalen Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (Beschwerdekammer), \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: