Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 116 • KG SZ BEK 2022 116 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Provisional Attachment Order

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 116
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a decision concerning a provisional attachment order regarding a claim. The appealing party sought to overturn the lower court's decision to grant the attachment, arguing that the requirements for such an order were not met. The appellate court reviewed the evidence and determined that the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that the requirements for lifting the attachment—specifically, the non-existence or invalidity of the underlying claim—were met, thus upholding the lower court's decision to maintain the provisional attachment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Provisional Attachment Order: The appealing party sought to overturn the lower court's decision to grant the attachment, arguing that the requirements for such an order were not met. The appellate court reviewed the evidence and determined that the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that the requirements for lifting the attachment—specifically, the non-existence or invalidity of the underlying claim—were met, thus upholding the lower court's decision to maintain the provisional attachment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pignoramento provvisorio azione di risarcimento danni da sequestro legittimazione a ricorrere sequestro di beni eccezione di incostituzionalità rinvio pregiudiziale Arrest/Arresteinsprache | Arrest
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2017 147
Appeal Regarding Attachment and Provisional Measures
BEK 2019 209
Appeal of Attachment Order Validity
BEK 2019 179
Appeal Against Attachment Order Validity
BEK 2018 41
Attachment Order Dispute Appeal
BEK 2021 100
Appeal of Attachment Ruling Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 20. Dezember 2022 \n BEK 2022 116 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann, LL.M. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Arrest/Arresteinsprache |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 25. Juli 2022, ZES 2022 256);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: