Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 114 • KG SZ BEK 2022 114 Generato dall'IA

Defendant v. Prosecutor on Appointment of Defense Counsel

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 114
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a prosecutor's decision regarding the appointment of necessary/official legal defense. The court upheld the appeal, concluding that the initial decision denying official defense was incorrect because the case circumstances indicated that the defendant required legal assistance to ensure a fair defense, thereby justifying the appointment of state-funded counsel.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Defendant v. Prosecutor on Appointment of Defense Counsel: The court upheld the appeal, concluding that the initial decision denying official defense was incorrect because the case circumstances indicated that the defendant required legal assistance to ensure a fair defense, thereby justifying the appointment of state-funded counsel.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
nomina del difensore principio di opportunità diritti della difesa indennizzo del difensore d'ufficio procedura disciplinare degli avvocati ammissione del pubblico ministero notwendige/amtliche Verteidigung | UP/amtliche Verteidigung
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 132
Appeal of Criminal Defense Appointment
BEK 2018 168
Appeal Against Denial of Official Defense Counsel
BEK 2017 80
Prosecutorial Appointment of Defense Counsel Premature
BEK 2025 130
Challenge to Substitution of Court-Appointed Defense Counsel
BEK 2022 115
Mootness of Appeal Regarding Defense Counsel Appointment After Indictment

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 22. Dezember 2022 \n BEK 2022 114 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, \n gesetzlich vertreten durch B.________, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n notwendige/amtliche Verteidigung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 22. Juli 2022, SUJ 2022 210);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: