Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 111 • KG SZ BEK 2022 111 Generato dall'IA

Corporate Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization for Monetary Claim

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 111
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A corporate entity appealed a lower court's decision granting definitive legal authorization (Rechtsöffnung) to another party regarding a monetary claim. The appellant argued that the enforcement documents did not constitute a legally recognized debt instrument sufficient to warrant summary judgment for definitive legal authorization. The court, however, reasoned that the documents submitted by the respondent, interpreted under established legal standards for establishing a recognized debt, sufficiently substantiated the claim to support the lower court's decision to grant definitive legal authorization, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Corporate Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization for Monetary Claim: The appellant argued that the enforcement documents did not constitute a legally recognized debt instrument sufficient to warrant summary judgment for definitive legal authorization. The court, however, reasoned that the documents submitted by the respondent, interpreted under established legal standards for establishing a recognized debt, sufficiently substantiated the claim to support the lower court's decision to grant definitive legal authorization, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
credito in esecuzione debito sociale persona giuridica autorizzazione ad agire decisione d'esecuzione produzione di documenti finanziari definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 165
Appeal of Definitive Legal Authorization for Debt Claim
BEK 2023 128
Appeal Against Denial of Definitive Legal Authorization
BEK 2024 92
Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization in Debt Enforcement
BEK 2019 153
Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization for Debt Collection
BEK 2020 119
Appeal of Definitive Legal Authorization for Debt Collection

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 27. Dezember 2022 \n BEK 2022 111 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann, LL.M. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Küssnacht vom 4. Juli 2022, ZES 2022 46);-

\n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: