Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 11 • KG SZ BEK 2022 11 Generato dall'IA

Municipality v. Taxpayer: Definitive Letters of Execution Upheld

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A respondent appealed a lower court's decision granting definitive letters of execution (definitive Rechtsöffnung) in favor of a municipality regarding an outstanding debt. The court, reviewing the appeal against the lower court's ruling, determined that the underlying document—a tax assessment notice—constituted an acknowledgement of debt sufficient to support the definitive letters of execution under the relevant law, thereby upholding the initial decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Municipality v. Taxpayer: Definitive Letters of Execution Upheld: The court, reviewing the appeal against the lower court's ruling, determined that the underlying document—a tax assessment notice—constituted an acknowledgement of debt sufficient to support the definitive letters of execution under the relevant law, thereby upholding the initial decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisione di tassazione debiti fiscali autorità giudiziaria fiscale legittimazione del comune imposte comunali validità dell'esecuzione Definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 178
Municipality and Religious Community v. Debtor (Final Execution Leave)
BEK 2022 17
Appeal Regarding Definitive Grant of Execution for Debt Collection
BEK 2017 111
Appeal Against Denial of Definitive Execution of Debt
BEK 2019 113
Appeal Against Definitive Execution Authorization Between Municipalities
BEK 2022 90
Appeal Against Provisional Execution Based on Acknowledgment of Debt Dismissed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 16. Februar 2022 \n BEK 2022 11 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Stadt und Gemeinde von Locarno, 6600 Locarno, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertr. durch Esattoria Comunale, Piazzetta de'Capitani 2, 6601 Locarno, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 8. November 2021, ZES 2021 393);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass