Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 101 • KG SZ BEK 2022 101 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Finality of Untimely Penalty Order

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 101
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a prosecutor's decision regarding the finality of a penalty order, which was issued after the defendant failed to appeal the initial penalty order within the prescribed timeframe. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appeal against the penalty order itself was inadmissible because it was not filed within the statutory period following the notification of the penalty order, and the subsequent appeal against the prosecutor's subsequent declaration of finality was therefore also unfounded as it challenged a determination based on the prior, unchallenged finality.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Finality of Untimely Penalty Order: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appeal against the penalty order itself was inadmissible because it was not filed within the statutory period following the notification of the penalty order, and the subsequent appeal against the prosecutor's subsequent declaration of finality was therefore also unfounded as it challenged a determination based on the prior, unchallenged finality.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
notificazione della decisione decreto penale controllo della commisurazione della pena ritardo ingiustificato principio di opportunità impugnabilità di decisioni incidentali Feststellung der Rechtskraft (Strafbefehl) | Übriges Strafprozessrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2025 24
Defendant's Appeal Against Prosecutor's Determination of Penalty Order Finality Barred by Untimely Appeal of Penalty Order
BEK 2025 102
Appeal Against Procedural Order Denying Finality of Penalty Order
BEK 2023 139
Prosecutor v. Defendant on Timeliness of Penalty Order Objection
BEK 2018 171
Appeal Against Finality of Criminal Penalty Order
BEK 2025 54
Appeal Dismissed Due to Untimely Objection to Criminal Penalty Order

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 8. Juli 2022 \n BEK 2022 101 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Feststellung der Rechtskraft (Strafbefehl) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 23. Mai 2022, SU 2021 8980);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: