Cantonal Traffic Law Violation Appeal Upheld
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn appellant, convicted of a willful violation of the cantonal road traffic law, appealed a district court's decision. The appellate court upheld the original verdict because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the lower court's factual findings were erroneous or that the law was misapplied, concluding that the evidence presented supported the initial conviction for the traffic offense.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IACantonal Traffic Law Violation Appeal Upheld: The appellate court upheld the original verdict because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the lower court's factual findings were erroneous or that the law was misapplied, concluding that the evidence presented supported the initial conviction for the traffic offense.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 21. Juli 2021 \n BEK 2021 2 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n vorsätzliche Widerhandlung gegen das kantonale Strassengesetz |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 9. Dezember 2020, SEO 2019 16);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: