Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2021 177 • KG SZ BEK 2021 177 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings Dismissed

Numero d'incarto BEK 2021 177
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private party appealed a prosecutor's decision not to initiate criminal proceedings, arguing that the initial decision to discontinue the investigation was unfounded. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision not to proceed with the criminal case was based on a reasonable assessment of the evidence, concluding that the factual basis required to meet the threshold for criminal prosecution was not sufficiently established.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings Dismissed: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision not to proceed with the criminal case was based on a reasonable assessment of the evidence, concluding that the factual basis required to meet the threshold for criminal prosecution was not sufficiently established.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale privata inchiesta penale valutazione delle prove difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico decisione motivata decisione di non sollevare obiezioni Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren | Staatsanwaltschaft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 194
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 182
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2023 113
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2024 8
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2021 89
Appeal of Decision Not to Prosecute

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 25. März 2022 \n BEK 2021 177 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Michelle Mettler. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 2. November 2021, SU 2021 8885);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: