Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2021 144 • KG SZ BEK 2021 144 Generato dall'IA

Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied Due to Prior Unfavorable Rulings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2021 144
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party filed a motion requesting the recusal of the presiding judge and two other members of the court chamber based on allegations of bias regarding prior judicial activities involving the same parties in related proceedings. The court dismissed the motion, reasoning that the mere fact that the judges had presided over prior related cases, which resulted in decisions that were unfavorable to the moving party, does not automatically establish a justifiable ground for bias or a failure to maintain impartiality in the current matter, as their prior involvement was within the scope of their judicial duties and did not indicate personal prejudice against the requesting party.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied Due to Prior Unfavorable Rulings: The court dismissed the motion, reasoning that the mere fact that the judges had presided over prior related cases, which resulted in decisions that were unfavorable to the moving party, does not automatically establish a justifiable ground for bias or a failure to maintain impartiality in the current matter, as their prior involvement was within the scope of their judicial duties and did not indicate personal prejudice against the requesting party.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
domanda di ricusazione imparzialità del giudice procedure connesse azione di separazione censura di violazione costituzionale diritto alla risoluzione del contratto Ausstand | Ausstandsbegehren
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 99
Denial of Motion for Judicial Recusal Based on Prior Rulings
BEK 2019 139
Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied Due to Insufficient Showing of Bias
BEK 2023 126
Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied
BEK 2023 70
Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied Due to Insufficient Showing of Bias
BEK 2025 29
Petitioner's Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 20. Dezember 2021 \n BEK 2021 144 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Claude Brüesch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchstellerin, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Gesuchsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, 2. C.________, 3. D.________, Weitere Verfahrensbeteiligte (beklagtische Seite), |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ausstand |\n \n\n

\n (Ausstandsgesuch vom 29. September 2021, SU 2021 6114);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: