Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2021 12 • KG SZ BEK 2021 12 Generato dall'IA

Private Complainants v. Prosecutor (Coercion and Defamation Charges)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2021 12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private complainants appealed a prosecutor's decision not to press charges related to alleged coercion, defamation, and violations of tenant protection statutes regarding a dispute, and the Cantonal Court rejected the appeal because the complainants failed to demonstrate that the prosecutor's decision not to proceed was legally flawed or arbitrary, concluding that the evidence presented did not meet the threshold required to overturn the initial decision to dismiss the case.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private Complainants v. Prosecutor (Coercion and Defamation Charges): Private complainants appealed a prosecutor's decision not to press charges related to alleged coercion, defamation, and violations of tenant protection statutes regarding a dispute, and the Cantonal Court rejected the appeal because the complainants failed to demonstrate that the prosecutor's decision not to proceed was legally flawed or arbitrary, concluding that the evidence presented did not meet the threshold required to overturn the initial decision to dismiss the case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diffamazione ricusazione del pubblico ministero protezione degli inquilini presentazione di denunce penali causa civile reati contro la sicurezza dei rapporti giuridici
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 13
Private Plaintiffs Appeal Refusal to Prosecute Coercion and Defamation
BEK 2018 17
Private Complainants v. Public Prosecutor (Dismissal of Abuse of Office Charges)
BEK 2021 14
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Press Charges
BEK 2021 33
Private Appeal of Refusal to Prosecute Defamation Upheld
BEK 2021 34
Complainant Appeal of Decision Not to Prosecute Defamation

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 8. April 2021 \n BEK 2021 12 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, 2. B.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertr. durch A.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Nötigung, Verleumdung, Widerhandlungen gegen die Bestimmungen zum Schutz der Mieter) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 19. Januar 2021, SU 2020 333);- \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: