Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2021 1 • KG SZ BEK 2021 1 Generato dall'IA

Claimant Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Representation Over Public Interest Threshold

Numero d'incarto BEK 2021 1
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private claimant appealed a prosecutor's decision denying free legal representation in a criminal proceeding, contending the lower court erred by finding the case lacked sufficient public interest and the claimant could afford counsel. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that while the claimant asserted limited financial means, the threshold for granting free representation requires a significant public interest in the matter, which was not sufficiently demonstrated to override the claimant's obligation to cover costs, thus upholding the initial denial.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claimant Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Representation Over Public Interest Threshold: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that while the claimant asserted limited financial means, the threshold for granting free representation requires a significant public interest in the matter, which was not sufficiently demonstrated to override the claimant's obligation to cover costs, thus upholding the initial denial.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rappresentanza legale tutela dell'interesse pubblico legittimazione a ricorrere perdita dell'interesse giuridico procedura gratuita diritto al gratuito patrocinio unentgeltliche Rechtsvertretung der Privatklägerin | UP/amtliche Verteidigung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 10. Juni 2021 \n BEK 2021 1 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, SSB, 1. Abteilung, Postfach 75, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n unentgeltliche Rechtsvertretung der Privatklägerin |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 22. Dezember 2020, SU 2020 855);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: