Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 97 • KG SZ BEK 2020 97 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order Upheld

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 97
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual, held in pre-trial detention following a decision by a single judge of the coercive measures court, filed an appeal against the detention order. The appellate court reviewed the initial decision concerning the detention, which was based on a suspicion of having committed a crime, and considered the appellant's arguments against the continued deprivation of liberty, ultimately upholding the lower court's order for security detention based on the established legal grounds and evidence presented.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order Upheld: The appellate court reviewed the initial decision concerning the detention, which was based on a suspicion of having committed a crime, and considered the appellant's arguments against the continued deprivation of liberty, ultimately upholding the lower court's order for security detention based on the established legal grounds and evidence presented.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
carcerazione preventiva privazione della libertà delitto contro la persona misure coercitive impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio diritti del detenuto Anordnung von Sicherheitshaft | Zwangsmassnahmen/Haft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 171
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order
BEK 2021 37
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Upheld
BEK 2017 174
Appeal of Pre-Trial Detention Order
BEK 2025 125
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order
BEK 2025 30
Appeal Against Extension of Pre-Trial Detention

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 16. Juli 2020 \n BEK 2020 97 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Jörg Meister, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Bezirksgericht March, Postfach 48, Bahnhofplatz 3, 8853 Lachen, Antragstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Anordnung von Sicherheitshaft |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Einzelrichterin am Zwangsmassnahmengericht vom 12. Juni 2020, ZME 2020 51);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: