Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 92 • KG SZ BEK 2020 92 Generato dall'IA

Animal Protection Law Violation Appeal Modification

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 92
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant was convicted by the lower court for multiple intentional violations of animal protection law, leading to an appeal against this verdict. The appellate court reviewed the evidence and determined that the prosecution failed to establish the necessary elements of intentional violation beyond a reasonable doubt regarding some of the alleged incidents, while upholding the conviction for others where the facts clearly demonstrated fault; consequently, the court partially upheld the appeal, modifying the original sentence to reflect only the sustained convictions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Animal Protection Law Violation Appeal Modification: The appellate court reviewed the evidence and determined that the prosecution failed to establish the necessary elements of intentional violation beyond a reasonable doubt regarding some of the alleged incidents, while upholding the conviction for others where the facts clearly demonstrated fault; consequently, the court partially upheld the appeal, modifying the original sentence to reflect only the sustained convictions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
modifica della sentenza dubbio ragionevole violazione dei diritti procedurali contravvenzione alla legge federale sugli stupefacenti contravvenzione natura dell'infrazione
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 76
Appeal Regarding Intentional Animal Protection Law Violations
BEK 2019 85
Animal Protection and Leash Law Violations Appeal
BEK 2019 84
Animal Protection Violation Conviction Overturned Due to Insufficient Reasoning and Denial of Right to Be Heard
STK 2022 46
Appeal of Willful Animal Cruelty and Welfare Violations Conviction
STK 2019 35
Appeal Regarding Animal Cruelty Conviction

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 28. Dezember 2020 \n BEK 2020 92 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n mehrfache vorsätzliche Widerhandlung gegen das Tierschutzgesetz |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 28. Mai 2020, SEO 2019 31);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: