Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2020 75 • KG SZ BEK 2020 75 Generato dall'IA

Rechtsöffnung Denial Affirmed Due to Existing Enforcement Action

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 75
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party sought definitive legal clearance (Rechtsöffnung) based on an instrument that was allegedly already subject to an enforcement order from a lower court, leading to an appeal against the lower court's decision denying that clearance. The reviewing court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that definitive legal clearance cannot be granted when the underlying claim is already subject to an existing, valid enforcement procedure, as the requirements for granting such clearance under the relevant statute were not met in this overlapping procedural context.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Rechtsöffnung Denial Affirmed Due to Existing Enforcement Action: The reviewing court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that definitive legal clearance cannot be granted when the underlying claim is already subject to an existing, valid enforcement procedure, as the requirements for granting such clearance under the relevant statute were not met in this overlapping procedural context.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorizzazione all’esecuzione presupposto processuale esecuzione di atti autentici procedura di infrazione titolo all'ordine validità dell'esecuzione definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 14. Januar 2021 \n BEK 2020 75 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Claude Brüesch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staat Zürich, 8000 Zürich, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich, Postfach 1226, Militärstrasse 36, 8090 Zürich, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 29. April 2020, ZES 2020 90);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: