Judge Disqualification Appeal Based on Prior Professional Relationship
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA party filed a motion to disqualify a judge, asserting a ground for bias, which the lower court rejected. The reviewing appellate court considered the motion based on the alleged facts presented by the party concerning the judge's prior professional relationship with the opposing counsel, finding that the connection, while existing, was not sufficient to objectively suggest a lack of impartiality or a significant appearance of impropriety in the current proceedings, and therefore upheld the rejection of the recusal request.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAJudge Disqualification Appeal Based on Prior Professional Relationship: The reviewing appellate court considered the motion based on the alleged facts presented by the party concerning the judge's prior professional relationship with the opposing counsel, finding that the connection, while existing, was not sufficient to objectively suggest a lack of impartiality or a significant appearance of impropriety in the current proceedings, and therefore upheld the rejection of the recusal request.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 15. Juni 2020 \n BEK 2020 73 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, \n Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ausstand |\n \n\n
\n (Gesuch vom 11. Mai 2020, VAB 2020 17);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: