Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 69 • KG SZ BEK 2020 69 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Embezzlement Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 69
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private claimant appealed a prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings against an accused individual concerning embezzlement. The court reviewed the appeal, which challenged the discontinuation order issued by the cantonal prosecutor's office regarding the alleged act of embezzlement. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision to terminate the proceedings, reasoning that the evidence did not sufficiently establish the elements of the charged offense to warrant proceeding to trial.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Embezzlement Proceedings: The court reviewed the appeal, which challenged the discontinuation order issued by the cantonal prosecutor's office regarding the alleged act of embezzlement. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision to terminate the proceedings, reasoning that the evidence did not sufficiently establish the elements of the charged offense to warrant proceeding to trial.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
abbandono del procedimento appropriazione indebita ricusazione del pubblico ministero infrazione ritiro della querela penale utile Einstellung Strafverfahren (Veruntreuung) | Einstellung Strafverfahren
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 47
Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Embezzlement Proceedings
BEK 2017 88
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 170
Appeal of Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 184
Appeal of Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2021 77
Private Appeal of Discontinued Embezzlement Prosecution

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 21. Dezember 2020 \n BEK 2020 69 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (Veruntreuung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 18. März 2020, SUB 2017 651);- \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: