Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 48 • KG SZ BEK 2020 48 Generato dall'IA

Appealability of Interlocutory Order on Official Defense Costs

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 48
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a complaint against a lower court's decision regarding the compensation of an official defense attorney. The court reasoned that the complaint was inadmissible because the challenged decision, concerning the official defense costs, was not a final judgment but rather an interlocutory order for which the proper procedural recourse was an appeal, not a complaint as filed by the appealing party.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appealability of Interlocutory Order on Official Defense Costs: The court reasoned that the complaint was inadmissible because the challenged decision, concerning the official defense costs, was not a final judgment but rather an interlocutory order for which the proper procedural recourse was an appeal, not a complaint as filed by the appealing party.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
impugnabilità di decisioni incidentali spese di difesa ripetibili dell'avvocato decisioni incidentali risoluzione alternativa delle controversie corrispondenza con il difensore Entschädigung des amtlichen Verteidigers | Kosten- und Entschädigungsfolgen
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 73
Appealability of Interlocutory Order Denying Definitive Legal Clearance
ZK2 2020 78
Appealability of Interlocutory Decision on Motion to Dismiss Venue
BEK 2019 20
Appealability of Interlocutory Ruling on Jurisdiction in Summary Proceedings
BEK 2022 84
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision on Official Defense Cost Compensation
BEK 2023 28
Appeal of Official Defense Attorney Compensation Calculation

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 1. Mai 2020 \n BEK 2020 48 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Entschädigung des amtlichen Verteidigers |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen das unbegründete Urteil des Strafgerichts vom 28. Februar 2020, SGO 2020 1);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: