Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 22 • KG SZ BEK 2020 22 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal of Free Legal Aid for Private Complainant

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appeal concerned a refusal by the public prosecutor's office to grant a private complainant free legal aid regarding a criminal investigation. The Cantonal Court ruled that the requirements for granting free legal aid under the applicable procedural law were not met because the complainant had not demonstrated that pursuing the legal action was unavoidable despite her current financial situation, nor had the case reached a stage where legal representation was strictly necessary for the proper conduct of the proceedings, leading the court to dismiss the appeal and uphold the decision to deny assistance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal of Free Legal Aid for Private Complainant: The Cantonal Court ruled that the requirements for granting free legal aid under the applicable procedural law were not met because the complainant had not demonstrated that pursuing the legal action was unavoidable despite her current financial situation, nor had the case reached a stage where legal representation was strictly necessary for the proper conduct of the proceedings, leading the court to dismiss the appeal and uphold the decision to deny assistance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
gratuito patrocinio rappresentanza legale direzione del processo inchiesta penale omissione del ministero pubblico azione penale privata unentgeltliche Rechtspflege (Beginn) | UP/amtliche Verteidigung
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 150
Plaintiff's Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Assistance Upheld
BEK 2020 170
Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Aid in Criminal Prosecution
BEK 2022 159
Complainant v. Public Prosecutor (Legal Aid Denial)
BEK 2019 168
Cantonal Public Prosecutor's Office v. Legal Aid Denial Appeal
BEK 2019 146
Appeal Regarding Denial of Publicly Funded Legal Representation in Criminal Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 15. Juni 2020 \n BEK 2020 22 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n unentgeltliche Rechtspflege |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln vom 31. Januar 2020, SUE 2019 483);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: