Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 194 • KG SZ BEK 2020 194 Generato dall'IA

Debtor's Appeal of Vehicle Seizure Rejected Due to Availability of Public Transit

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 194
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A debtor appealed a decision by a lower court that upheld the seizure of a vehicle by the debt collection office, arguing the vehicle was essential for their professional work, but the appellate court rejected the appeal because the lower court correctly determined that the vehicle, although used for work, was not strictly indispensable for the debtor's livelihood given the availability of public transportation, thus affirming the seizure's legality under debt enforcement law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Debtor's Appeal of Vehicle Seizure Rejected Due to Availability of Public Transit: A debtor appealed a decision by a lower court that upheld the seizure of a vehicle by the debt collection office, arguing the vehicle was essential for their professional work, but the appellate court rejected the appeal because the lower court correctly determined that the vehicle, although used for work, was not strictly indispensable for the debtor's livelihood given the availability of public transportation, thus affirming the seizure's legality under debt enforcement law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sequestro del veicolo incasso decisione d'esecuzione debito pubblico rivendicazione della proprietà lavori pubblici SchKG-Beschwerde, Wegnahme Fahrzeug | SchKG-Beschwerde
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 177
Appeal Against Vehicle Seizure in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
BEK 2021 73
Appeal Dismissed: Vehicle Seizure Upheld Due to Insolvent Business Operations
BEK 2018 92
Vehicle Seizure Upheld Against Unprofitable Business Claim
BEK 2019 109
Vehicle Seizure Upheld in Criminal Proceedings Appeal
BEK 2019 59
Appeal Regarding Vehicle Release in Bankruptcy

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 5. Februar 2021 \n BEK 2020 194 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführer, gegen Betreibungsamt Küssnacht, Postfach 57, Seeplatz 2/3, 6403 Küssnacht am Rigi, Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n SchKG-Beschwerde, Wegnahme Fahrzeug |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Bezirksgerichtspräsidenten Küssnacht am Rigi vom 12. November 2020, APD 2020 5);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer \n als obere kantonale Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: