Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 187 • KG SZ BEK 2020 187 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed for Untimeliness

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 187
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal concerning the finality of a decision, specifically an appeal filed by a defendant against a prosecutor's order dated October 26, 2020. The court determined that the appeal was filed after the statutory deadline had passed, as the appellant failed to submit the required documentation and grounds within the prescribed time frame following the notification of the initial decision. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal as inadmissible due to untimeliness.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed for Untimeliness: The court determined that the appeal was filed after the statutory deadline had passed, as the appellant failed to submit the required documentation and grounds within the prescribed time frame following the notification of the initial decision. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal as inadmissible due to untimeliness.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
notificazione della decisione termine legale deposito tardivo procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza tempestività dell'istanza di ricusazione impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio Beschwerde (Feststellung der Rechtskraft) | Übriges Strafprozessrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 141
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
BEK 2020 83
Appeal Dismissed for Inadmissibility and Untimeliness
ZK1 2019 37
Dismissal for Untimely Appeal Brief
BEK 2020 148
Untimely Appeal Dismissed for Missing Statutory Deadline
ZK1 2018 34
Appeal Untimely Due to Missed Deadline

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 18. Dezember 2020 \n BEK 2020 187 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Beschwerde (Feststellung der Rechtskraft) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft March vom 26. Oktober 2020, SUM 2020 935);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: