Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2020 182 • KG SZ BEK 2020 182 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Definitive Summary Judgment and Party Costs

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 182
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a lower court's decision concerning definitive summary judgment proceedings and the award of party costs. The appellant sought to overturn the lower court's ruling regarding the final confirmation of executory judgment, which inherently involved a determination of the underlying entitlement to payment, and the associated decision on legal costs. The reviewing court addressed the appeal by examining whether the prerequisites for definitive summary judgment were met under the relevant procedural law and consequently upheld or altered the initial determination on the merits and the allocation of legal expenses.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Definitive Summary Judgment and Party Costs: The appellant sought to overturn the lower court's ruling regarding the final confirmation of executory judgment, which inherently involved a determination of the underlying entitlement to payment, and the associated decision on legal costs. The reviewing court addressed the appeal by examining whether the prerequisites for definitive summary judgment were met under the relevant procedural law and consequently upheld or altered the initial determination on the merits and the allocation of legal expenses.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esame nel merito spese di procedura decisione incidentale impugnabile revisione di una decisione sindacato giurisdizionale effetti delle pronunce pregiudiziali
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 2. Dezember 2020 \n BEK 2020 182 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Etat de Vaud, Ordre Judiciaire, 1014 Lausanne Adm cant VD, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Office des poursuites du district de Lavaux Oron, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung; Parteientschädigung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 29. Oktober 2020, ZES 2020 444);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: