Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 177 • KG SZ BEK 2020 177 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Vehicle Seizure in Debt Enforcement Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 177
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a decision by a lower court official regarding the seizure of a vehicle in debt enforcement proceedings, arguing that the seizure was improper. The appellate court considered the appeal against the seizure order, which involved a dispute between the appellant, a debt enforcement office, and the federal government (represented by the Federal Tax Administration), ultimately determining the validity of the vehicle's attachment under debt collection law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Vehicle Seizure in Debt Enforcement Proceedings: The appellate court considered the appeal against the seizure order, which involved a dispute between the appellant, a debt enforcement office, and the federal government (represented by the Federal Tax Administration), ultimately determining the validity of the vehicle's attachment under debt collection law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sequestro del veicolo esecuzione per debiti sequestro di beni debito fiscale procedura di sequestro tassa sui veicoli SchKG-Beschwerde, Fahrzeugpfändung | SchKG-Beschwerde
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 194
Debtor's Appeal of Vehicle Seizure Rejected Due to Availability of Public Transit
BEK 2021 196
Appeal of Debt Enforcement Seizure Dismissed
BEK 2023 13
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Proceedings Decision
BEK 2019 109
Vehicle Seizure Upheld in Criminal Proceedings Appeal
BEK 2020 202
Appeal of Debt Enforcement Order

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 28. Dezember 2020 \n BEK 2020 177 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Betreibungsamt Küssnacht, Postfach 57, Seeplatz 2/3, 6403 Küssnacht am Rigi, Beschwerdegegner, 2. Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft, 3000 Bern, Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertr. durch Eidgenössische Steuerverwaltung, Hauptabteilung Ressourcen, Schwarztorstrasse 50, 3007 Bern, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n SchKG-Beschwerde, Fahrzeugpfändung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Gerichtspräsidenten am Bezirksgericht Küssnacht vom 22. Oktober 2020, APD 2020 7);-

\n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer \n als obere kantonale Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: