Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 174 • KG SZ BEK 2020 174 Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Debt Enforcement Appeal Dismissed

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 174
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a first-instance decision granting definitive letters of enforcement (definitive Rechtsöffnung) against them, where the opposing party was a Canton seeking collection of an outstanding debt. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the creditor had sufficiently established the existence of a legally enforceable claim by presenting an instrument that met the formal requirements for such an order, thereby upholding the decision to grant definitive letters of enforcement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Debt Enforcement Appeal Dismissed: The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the creditor had sufficiently established the existence of a legally enforceable claim by presenting an instrument that met the formal requirements for such an order, thereby upholding the decision to grant definitive letters of enforcement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
credito in esecuzione decisione d'esecuzione titolo all'ordine revoca del fallimento deposito del debito azione di accertamento definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 32
Cantonal Debt Enforcement Appeal Dismissal
BEK 2023 99
Cantonal Authority Debt Collection Appeal Dismissed
BEK 2018 160
Cantonal Court Upholds Denial of Provisional Legal Authorization in Debt Enforcement Appeal
BEK 2018 191
Cantonal Court Ruling on Debt Enforcement Appeal
BEK 2017 110
Cantonal Court Dismisses Debt Enforcement Appeal for Untimely and Insufficiently Substantiated Grounds

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 25. Januar 2021 \n BEK 2020 174 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Kanton Zürich, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, \n vertr. durch Zentrale Inkassostelle der Gerichte, Obergericht des Kantons Zürich, Postfach 2401, Hirschengraben 15, 8001 Zürich, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Einsiedeln vom 28. Oktober 2020, ZES 2020 125);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: