Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 169 • KG SZ BEK 2020 169 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal to Prosecute Official Secrecy Violation

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 169
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private litigant appealed a prosecutor's decision not to initiate proceedings regarding an alleged violation of official secrecy. The court considered the appeal against the prosecutor's refusal to investigate, focusing on whether the initial facts presented constituted a violation of the duty of official secrecy, ultimately upholding the prosecutor's decision based on the insufficient evidential basis to proceed with a criminal investigation for the specified offense.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal to Prosecute Official Secrecy Violation: The court considered the appeal against the prosecutor's refusal to investigate, focusing on whether the initial facts presented constituted a violation of the duty of official secrecy, ultimately upholding the prosecutor's decision based on the insufficient evidential basis to proceed with a criminal investigation for the specified offense.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
segreto d'ufficio doveri del ministero pubblico inchiesta penale facoltà di astenersi dal testimoniare reati contro la sfera personale riservata violazione dei doveri di servizio
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 13
Private Litigants' Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision to Decline Investigation Upheld
BEK 2024 193
Appeal of Prosecutor's Refusal to Prosecute
BEK 2018 184
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Refusal to Prosecute Official Misconduct
BEK 2023 107
Appeal Regarding Non-Initiation of Proceedings for Breach of Professional Secrecy by Former Defense Attorney
BEK 2022 97
Private Complainant Standing to Appeal Discontinuation of Secrecy Violation Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 3. Februar 2021 \n BEK 2020 169 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Verletzung des Amtsgeheimnisses) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln vom 16. Oktober 2020, SUH 2019 1490);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: