Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 168 • KG SZ BEK 2020 168 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Mandatory Intoxication Testing Order

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 168
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns a challenge by an accused individual against an investigative order issued by the public prosecutor's office that mandated a determination of the individual's impairment due to intoxication. The court considered the basis for the investigative order, which stems from a situation requiring the establishment of the accused's fitness to drive, and ultimately ruled on the appeal concerning the legality and justification of the prosecutorial decision to compel testing for impairment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Mandatory Intoxication Testing Order: The court considered the basis for the investigative order, which stems from a situation requiring the establishment of the accused's fitness to drive, and ultimately ruled on the appeal concerning the legality and justification of the prosecutorial decision to compel testing for impairment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
idoneità alla guida esame dell'alito guida in stato di ebbrezza qualificata presentazione dinnanzi all'autorità gravi indizi di reato ordinanze probatorie
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 42
Appeal Against Mandatory Incapacitation Investigation for Suspected Impaired Driving
BEK 2021 60
Appeal Regarding Compelled Determination of Fitness to Drive
BEK 2019 123
Appeal Against Blood Test Order for Driving Impairment
STK 2021 38
State v. Defendant (Refusal of Sobriety Testing)
BEK 2021 152
State v. Accused: Investigative Order Appeal Regarding DUI Sample Collection

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 24. November 2020 \n BEK 2020 168 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Untersuchungsbefehl zur Feststellung der Fahrunfähigkeit |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft March vom 12. Oktober 2020, SUM 2020 1748);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: