Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 162 • KG SZ BEK 2020 162 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Impairment Investigation Order

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 162
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against an order issued by the public prosecutor's office mandating an investigation to determine the appellant's impairment while driving. The court considered the appeal against the decision of the lower prosecutor's office regarding the investigative order for determining driving impairment. The court reached its verdict by reasoning on the legality and necessity of the initial investigative measure taken by the public prosecutor.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Impairment Investigation Order: The court considered the appeal against the decision of the lower prosecutor's office regarding the investigative order for determining driving impairment. The court reached its verdict by reasoning on the legality and necessity of the initial investigative measure taken by the public prosecutor.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ordinanze probatorie omissione del ministero pubblico guida in stato di inattitudine inchiesta penale esame delle censure formali procedura di ricusazione
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 117
Appeal Against Order for Driving Impairment Assessment
BEK 2020 99
Prosecutor's Order for Driving Unfitness Investigation Upheld
BEK 2019 144
Appeal Against Impairment Investigation Mandate Sustained
BEK 2021 60
Appeal Regarding Compelled Determination of Fitness to Drive
BEK 2019 123
Appeal Against Blood Test Order for Driving Impairment

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 10. Februar 2021 \n BEK 2020 162 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Untersuchungsbefehl zur Feststellung der Fahrunfähigkeit |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 14. Oktober 2020, SUI 2020 3851, neu SU 2020 509);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: