Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 149 • KG SZ BEK 2020 149 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Legality of Pre-Trial Detention Upheld

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 149
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual, held in pre-trial detention pursuant to a lower court decision, filed a complaint challenging the legality of their continued detention. The appellate court reviewed the decision regarding the detention, which was based on the risk of flight and the need to secure the outcome of the criminal proceedings. The court ultimately upheld the contested decision, reasoning that the established grounds for pre-trial detention remained valid and that the requirements for imposing such a restrictive measure, including necessity and proportionality, were satisfied under the relevant procedural law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Challenge to Legality of Pre-Trial Detention Upheld: The appellate court reviewed the decision regarding the detention, which was based on the risk of flight and the need to secure the outcome of the criminal proceedings. The court ultimately upheld the contested decision, reasoning that the established grounds for pre-trial detention remained valid and that the requirements for imposing such a restrictive measure, including necessity and proportionality, were satisfied under the relevant procedural law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
carcerazione preventiva presupposto processuale motivi che possono invocarsi denuncia penale diritti del detenuto diritto di prelazione ordinario Untersuchungshaft | Zwangsmassnahmen/Haft

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The article is cited in the dispositive to regulate the costs of the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 188
Pre-Trial Detention Review Upheld
BEK 2020 97
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order Upheld
BEK 2021 37
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Upheld
BEK 2019 171
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order
BEK 2019 122
Appeal of Pre-Trial Detention Denial

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The article is cited in the dispositive to regulate the costs of the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 15. Oktober 2020 \n BEK 2020 149 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Untersuchungshaft |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Zwangsmassnahmengericht vom 11. September 2020, ZME 2020 75);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: