Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 141 • KG SZ BEK 2020 141 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed: Non-Appealable Enforcement Notice Decision

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 141
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a lower court's decision regarding enforcement proceedings, specifically contesting a notice for collection, which led to an appeal to the Cantonal Court acting as the superior cantonal supervisory authority in debt collection and bankruptcy matters. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, concluding that the decision being challenged, which related to a notice for collection within the enforcement process, was not a final decision subject to appeal under the relevant enforcement law provisions, thereby affirming the lower court's order on procedural grounds.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed: Non-Appealable Enforcement Notice Decision: The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, concluding that the decision being challenged, which related to a notice for collection within the enforcement process, was not a final decision subject to appeal under the relevant enforcement law provisions, thereby affirming the lower court's order on procedural grounds.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisione d'esecuzione procedura di fallimento decisioni incidentali organo dell'esecuzione forzata impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio eccezione di incostituzionalità Betreibungsrechtliche Beschwerde (Abholungseinladung) | SchKG-Beschwerde
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2024 1
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Appealability in Enforcement Proceedings
BEK 2021 210
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Seizure Based on Non-Final Judgment Dismissed
BEK 2023 151
Appeal Dismissed in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
BEK 2019 40
Appeal Against Intermediate Debt Enforcement Ruling Dismissed
BEK 2023 13
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Proceedings Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 22. September 2020 \n BEK 2020 141 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführer, gegen Betreibungskreis Altendorf Lachen, Postfach 43, Seeplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Betreibungsrechtliche Beschwerde (Abholungseinladung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Bezirksgerichtspräsidenten March vom 17. August 2020, APD 2020 7);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident \n als Präsident der oberen kantonalen Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (Beschwerdekammer), \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: