Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 139 • KG SZ BEK 2020 139 Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's DNA Order Upheld in Criminal Investigation Appeal

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 139
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a prosecutor's order for DNA profile creation related to an ongoing criminal investigation, challenging the legality of the order. The court reviewed the case and determined that the initial order was based on a sufficiently serious suspicion of a criminal offense, which legally justifies compelling the collection of biological material for DNA profiling under the applicable procedural rules, thereby upholding the prosecutor's decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's DNA Order Upheld in Criminal Investigation Appeal: The court reviewed the case and determined that the initial order was based on a sufficiently serious suspicion of a criminal offense, which legally justifies compelling the collection of biological material for DNA profiling under the applicable procedural rules, thereby upholding the prosecutor's decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prelievo di campioni DNA inchiesta penale decisioni incidentali principio di opportunità perizia per accertamento dell'età sottrazione illecita di dati personali DNA-Profilerstellung | Zwangsmassnahmen/Haft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 153
Prosecutor's DNA Profile Order Upheld Over Proportionality Challenge
BEK 2025 31
Prosecutor's Order for DNA Profile Collection Upheld Against Rights Infringement Claim
BEK 2018 151
Prosecutor's Order for DNA Profile Upheld Against Appellant
BEK 2023 146
Prosecutor v. Accused (DNA Profile Order Appeal)
BEK 2024 2
Appeal Against DNA Profile Order Dismissed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 1. Februar 2021 \n BEK 2020 139 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Gloria Guggenberger. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Postfach 75, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n DNA-Profilerstellung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 21. August 2020, SUI 2020 748, neu SU 2020 217);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: