Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 135 • KG SZ BEK 2020 135 Generato dall'IA

Third-Party Claimant v. Denial of Reinstatement of Attachment Objection Deadline

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 135
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A third-party claimant appealed a lower court's decision denying a request for reinstatement of the deadline to file an objection against an attachment, arguing that the initial failure to meet the deadline was excusable. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the third-party claimant failed to demonstrate that the procedural deadline was missed due to an objectively and subjectively excusable error, as the appellant did not sufficiently prove the purported grounds for the delay that would justify a reinstatement under the relevant procedural rules.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Third-Party Claimant v. Denial of Reinstatement of Attachment Objection Deadline: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the third-party claimant failed to demonstrate that the procedural deadline was missed due to an objectively and subjectively excusable error, as the appellant did not sufficiently prove the purported grounds for the delay that would justify a reinstatement under the relevant procedural rules.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inosservanza del termine ritardi procedurali errore scusabile procedura di rivendicazione nel pignoramento preclusione per tardività termini di ricorso Arresteinsprache (Fristwiederherstellung) | Arrest
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 42
Appellant v. Lower Court on Attachment Notice Appeal Timeliness
ZK2 2020 86
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Deadline Reinstatement Request
ZK2 2014 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant (Procedural Deadline Appeal)
BEK 2021 140
Appeal Regarding Untimely Objection to Provisional Attachment Order
ZK1 2024 38
Appellant's Third-Party Objection Timing in Asset Seizure Enforcement

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 2. Februar 2021 \n BEK 2020 135 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Drittansprecherin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Arrestgläubigerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, verbeiständet durch D.________, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Arresteinsprache (Fristwiederherstellung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 17. August 2020, ZES 2020 69);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: