Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 132 • KG SZ BEK 2020 132 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Criminal Defense Appointment

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 132
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a lower court's decision regarding the appointment of official legal defense, asserting that the initial court erred in its ruling on August 4, 2020, concerning the assignment of legal representation for the criminal proceedings. The appellate court reviewed the complaint against the single judge's decision and, having considered the relevant facts and legal arguments, issued its own resolution on September 30, 2020, addressing the validity of the defense appointment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Criminal Defense Appointment: The appellate court reviewed the complaint against the single judge's decision and, having considered the relevant facts and legal arguments, issued its own resolution on September 30, 2020, addressing the validity of the defense appointment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
denuncia penale nomina del difensore d'ufficio rappresentanza legale impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio diritti della difesa esame delle censure formali Amtliche Verteidigung | UP/amtliche Verteidigung
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 88
Appeal Regarding Appointment of Legal Defense in Youth Court Matter
BEK 2022 114
Defendant v. Prosecutor on Appointment of Defense Counsel
BEK 2017 80
Prosecutorial Appointment of Defense Counsel Premature
BEK 2022 115
Mootness of Appeal Regarding Defense Counsel Appointment After Indictment
ZK2 2022 29
Appeal Regarding Expert Witness Appointment

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 30. September 2020 \n BEK 2020 132 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n amtliche Verteidigung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Einzelrichterin am kantonalen Strafgericht vom 4. August 2020, SEO 2020 4);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: