Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 122 • KG SZ BEK 2020 122 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed in Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Case

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 122
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual filed a complaint against a decision by an enforcement office concerning debt enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings, appealing a prior decision by a district court president. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant's arguments regarding the alleged illegality of the enforcement measure were unsubstantiated and that the challenged decision of the lower court president was legally sound and appropriate based on the established facts and relevant law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed in Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Case: The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant's arguments regarding the alleged illegality of the enforcement measure were unsubstantiated and that the challenged decision of the lower court president was legally sound and appropriate based on the established facts and relevant law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esecuzione in via di fallimento commissario all'appuramento bonale dei debiti ufficiale esecutore apertura del fallimento decisione d'esecuzione opposizione al precetto esecutivo SchKG-Beschwerde | Küssnacht ER SchKG/Liq.-Sachen
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 151
Appeal Dismissed in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
BEK 2017 61
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Ruling
BEK 2020 14
Appeal Dismissed in Debt Enforcement Challenge
BEK 2021 196
Appeal of Debt Enforcement Seizure Dismissed
BEK 2023 13
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Proceedings Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 9. November 2020 \n BEK 2020 122 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Gloria Guggenberger. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführer, gegen Betreibungsamt Küssnacht, Postfach 57, 6403 Küssnacht am Rigi, Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n SchKG-Beschwerde |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Präsidenten des Bezirksgerichts Küssnacht am Rigi vom 27. Juli 2020, APD 2020 5);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident \n als Präsident der oberen kantonalen Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (Beschwerdekammer), \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: