Enforcement Authorization and Recognition of Foreign Judgment Challenge
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case involves a challenge to a lower court's decision regarding definitive legal authorization for enforcement (Rechtsöffnung) and recognition of a foreign judgment (Exequatur). The appellant sought to overturn the order, but the reviewing court upheld the original decision, reasoning that the requirements for granting definitive legal authorization, as established by the relevant procedural law concerning enforcement proceedings, were met by the evidence presented by the opposing party.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAEnforcement Authorization and Recognition of Foreign Judgment Challenge: The appellant sought to overturn the order, but the reviewing court upheld the original decision, reasoning that the requirements for granting definitive legal authorization, as established by the relevant procedural law concerning enforcement proceedings, were met by the evidence presented by the opposing party.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 14. Dezember 2020 \n BEK 2020 117 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, gegen B.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung und Exequatur |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 24. Juni 2020, ZES 2020 178);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: