Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 116 • KG SZ BEK 2020 116 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Authorization for DNA Collection Based on Insufficient Suspicion

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 116
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual, charged with an offense, appealed a prosecutor's order authorizing the collection of biological material for DNA profiling, contending that the initial suspicion level did not meet the legal threshold required for such an invasive measure. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the established facts, even if not definitively proving guilt, provided sufficient, specific, and concrete grounds to reasonably suspect the accused of having committed the crime, thereby justifying the DNA sample collection as a proportionate and legally permissible investigative step under the circumstances.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 382 Abs. 1 Bst. b StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 Bst. a StPO, Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO; Appeal Regarding Authorization for DNA Collection Based on Insufficient Suspicion: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the established facts, even if not definitively proving guilt, provided sufficient, specific, and concrete grounds to reasonably suspect the accused of having committed the crime, thereby justifying the DNA sample collection as a proportionate and legally permissible investigative step under the circumstances.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
delitto contro la persona prelievo di campioni DNA inutilizzabilità delle prove illecite procedura d'accertamento permesso di promuovere un procedimento penale eccezione di incostituzionalità Probeentnahme / DNA-Profilerstellung | Zwangsmassnahmen/Haft

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
This article governs the general provisions regarding the decision on appeals, used implicitly when ruling on the appeal.
Art. 382 Abs. 1 Bst. b StPO
This article is the basis for the decision to uphold the appeal because the contested decision infringed upon the defendant's rights.
Art. 429 Abs. 1 Bst. a StPO
This provision dictates the outcome regarding court costs when the appeal is upheld.
Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision governs the order for compensation of expenses when the appeal is upheld.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 67
Appeal Against Order Authorizing DNA Profile Creation
BEK 2023 146
Prosecutor v. Accused (DNA Profile Order Appeal)
BEK 2021 102
Prosecutor's Order for DNA Profiling Overturned Due to Insufficient Suspicion
BEK 2020 139
Prosecutor's DNA Order Upheld in Criminal Investigation Appeal
BEK 2024 2
Appeal Against DNA Profile Order Dismissed

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

This article governs the general provisions regarding the decision on appeals, used implicitly when ruling on the appeal.

Art. 382 Abs. 1 Bst. b StPO

This article is the basis for the decision to uphold the appeal because the contested decision infringed upon the defendant's rights.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 Bst. a StPO

This provision dictates the outcome regarding court costs when the appeal is upheld.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision governs the order for compensation of expenses when the appeal is upheld.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 31. August 2020 \n BEK 2020 116 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Cécile Annen. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Probeentnahme / DNA-Profilerstellung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft des Kantons Schwyz vom 10. Juli 2020, SUB 2019 384);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: