Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 113 • KG SZ BEK 2020 113 Generato dall'IA

Debt Enforcement Proceeding Appeal Inadmissibility

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 113
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company filed a complaint against a lower court's decision regarding a debt enforcement proceeding initiated by a debt collection office. The court ultimately dismissed the complaint because the appeal against the decision of the Vice District Court President, which was the subject of the current complaint, had already been rejected by the cantonal supervisory authority for debt enforcement and bankruptcy, rendering the current appeal inadmissible as it concerned a non-appealable prior decision under the relevant procedural rules.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Debt Enforcement Proceeding Appeal Inadmissibility: The court ultimately dismissed the complaint because the appeal against the decision of the Vice District Court President, which was the subject of the current complaint, had already been rejected by the cantonal supervisory authority for debt enforcement and bankruptcy, rendering the current appeal inadmissible as it concerned a non-appealable prior decision under the relevant procedural rules.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esecuzione per debiti ricorso all'autorità di vigilanza norme di procedura liquidazione ordinaria del fallimento impugnazione di decisioni amministrative ricorso per annullamento nel diritto dell'Unione Beschwerde | SchKG-Beschwerde
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 71
Appeal Inadmissibility in Debt Enforcement Proceedings Challenge
BEK 2021 114
Appeal of Debt Enforcement Proceeding Ruling
BEK 2023 13
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Proceedings Decision
BEK 2025 48
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Ruling
BEK 2021 195
Appeal in Debt Enforcement Procedure Challenge

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 24. Juli 2020 \n BEK 2020 113 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Betreibungsamt Höfe, Roosstrasse 3, 8832 Wollerau, Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Beschwerde |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Vize-Bezirksgerichtspräsidenten der Höfe vom 26. Juni 2020, APD 2020 15);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident \n als Präsident der oberen kantonalen Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (Beschwerdekammer), \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: