Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2020 110 • KG SZ BEK 2020 110 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Penal Order for Public Urination Dismissed Due to Untimely Objection

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 110
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An accused individual appealed a decision concerning a penal order related to the act of relieving oneself outside of sanitary facilities, arguing that the statutory period for lodging an objection had not yet expired. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the relevant procedural deadline had indeed been missed, thereby upholding the initial decision regarding the penal order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Penal Order for Public Urination Dismissed Due to Untimely Objection: The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the relevant procedural deadline had indeed been missed, thereby upholding the initial decision regarding the penal order.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inosservanza del termine decisioni incidentali momento del reato impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio violazione dell'ordine pubblico disdetta tardiva
Generato dall'IA
GPR 2020 18
Appeal of Criminal Penalty Order for Public Urination Due to Untimely Objection
BEK 2021 21
Appeal Against Dismissal of Untimely Objection to Penal Order
BEK 2025 85
Appeal Dismissed: Untimely Objection to Penal Order
BEK 2025 93
Late Objection to Penal Order Dismissed
BEK 2020 112
Untimely Appeal in Criminal Proceedings Dismissed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 24. September 2020 \n BEK 2020 110 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Strafbefehl (Einsprachefrist; Verrichten der Notdurft ausserhalb sanitärer Anlagen) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht March vom 7. Juli 2020, SEO 2020 12);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: