Appeal Regarding Provisional Legal Opening Decision
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case involves an appeal against a lower court's decision regarding provisional legal opening, where the appellant contested the decision that favored the opposing party concerning a legal claim. The appellate court reasoned that the lower court correctly found the claim to be sufficiently documented to warrant provisional legal opening, meaning the procedural requirements for such an order were met based on the evidence presented by the party seeking the opening.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Regarding Provisional Legal Opening Decision: The appellate court reasoned that the lower court correctly found the claim to be sufficiently documented to warrant provisional legal opening, meaning the procedural requirements for such an order were met based on the evidence presented by the party seeking the opening.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 25. September 2020 \n BEK 2020 109 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin M.A. HSG Sonia Zwirner. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, gegen B.________ AG, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 26. Juni 2020, ZES 2020 238);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: