Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2020 108 • KG SZ BEK 2020 108 Generato dall'IA

Execution of Debt Instrument Appeal

Numero d'incarto BEK 2020 108
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a dispute concerning a final grant of execution, the appellant challenged a lower court's decision, which had granted the respondent's application for definitive execution based on an enforceable debt instrument. The court, reviewing the appeal, upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the evidence presented by the respondent sufficiently demonstrated the existence and binding nature of the debt instrument required to justify the definitive grant of execution, thereby dismissing the appellant's objections.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Execution of Debt Instrument Appeal: The court, reviewing the appeal, upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the evidence presented by the respondent sufficiently demonstrated the existence and binding nature of the debt instrument required to justify the definitive grant of execution, thereby dismissing the appellant's objections.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisione esecutiva opposizione al precetto esecutivo rimborso del debito oggetto della lite interpretazione della sentenza protesto definitive Rechtsöffnung (EGV-SZ 2020 A 6.1) | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 13. November 2020 \n BEK 2020 108 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 1. Juli 2020, ZES 2020 119);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: