Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2019 20 • KG SZ BEK 2019 20 Generato dall'IA

Appealability of Interlocutory Ruling on Jurisdiction in Summary Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2019 20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a challenge against a lower court's decision regarding an objection to jurisdiction in definitive summary proceedings, where the objector sought to overturn a previous ruling that found the objection unfounded. The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the decision being appealed—an interlocutory ruling on jurisdiction—did not constitute a final judgment appealable under the relevant procedural law, thus affirming the lack of grounds for review against the initial determination of jurisdiction.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appealability of Interlocutory Ruling on Jurisdiction in Summary Proceedings: The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the decision being appealed—an interlocutory ruling on jurisdiction—did not constitute a final judgment appealable under the relevant procedural law, thus affirming the lack of grounds for review against the initial determination of jurisdiction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
impugnabilità di decisioni incidentali determinazione della competenza censure procedurali motivi che possono invocarsi procedimento pregiudiziale sentenze interpretative Unzuständigkeitseinrede (definitive Rechtsöffnung) | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2020 78
Appealability of Interlocutory Decision on Motion to Dismiss Venue
BEK 2019 73
Appealability of Interlocutory Order Denying Definitive Legal Clearance
BEK 2020 48
Appealability of Interlocutory Order on Official Defense Costs
ZK2 2017 57
Appeal Dismissed: Interlocutory Order on Negative Declaratory Action Admissibility
ZK1 2017 48
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Final Judgment on Jurisdiction

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 27. Mai 2019 \n BEK 2019 20 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Claude Brüesch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, gegen B.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Unzuständigkeitseinrede (definitive Rechtsöffnung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 24. Januar 2019, ZES 2018 631);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: