Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2019 186 • KG SZ BEK 2019 186 Generato dall'IA

Public Prosecutor v. Defendant (Tachograph Manipulation and Logbook Offenses Appeal)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2019 186
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal by the public prosecutor against a district court judgment concerning a defendant accused of multiple counts of intentionally manipulating the tachograph, negligently failing to use control devices correctly, and intentionally failing to carry the logbook. The appellate court reviewed the decision regarding these offenses, which relate to driving and work-time regulations, ultimately considering the findings and evidence presented in the initial ruling to rule on the appeal filed by the prosecution against the defendant.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

mehrfaches vorsätzliches unrichtiges Bedienen des Fahrtschreibers, mehrfaches fahrlässiges nicht korrektes Führen der Kontrollmittel, mehrfaches vorsätzliches Nichtmitführen des Arbeitsbuches | Strassenverkehrsrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
atti penali esame delle censure formali margine d'apprezzamento del ministero pubblico pena accessoria ricusazione di pubblici ministeri natura dell'infrazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision mandates the imposition of costs when an appeal is dismissed.
Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision governs the allocation of costs when an appeal is dismissed.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2020 47
Prosecutor v. Defendant (Traffic, Criminal, and Narcotics Violations Appeal)
BEK 2023 26
Prosecutor v. Defendant (DUI Appeal)
BEK 2024 79
Prosecutor v. Accused (Parking Meter Infraction)
STK 2017 36
Prosecutor v. Accused: Traffic Violations and Obstruction of Official Action Appeal
STK 2022 71
Prosecutor v. Accused: Appeal of Criminal Convictions and Sentencing

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision mandates the imposition of costs when an appeal is dismissed.

Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision governs the allocation of costs when an appeal is dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 20. November 2019 \n BEK 2019 186 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt A.________, gegen B.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsgegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n mehrfaches vorsätzliches unrichtiges Bedienen des Fahrtschreibers, mehrfaches fahrlässiges nicht korrektes Führen der Kontrollmittel, mehrfaches vorsätzliches Nichtmitführen des Arbeitsbuches |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 5. Juni 2019, SEO 2019 6);- \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: