Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2019 179 • KG SZ BEK 2019 179 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Attachment Order Validity

Numero d'incarto BEK 2019 179
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a lower court's decision regarding an attachment order (Arrest). The appellant, who was the respondent in the attachment proceedings, challenged the decision that upheld the attachment obtained by the applicant. The court reasoned that the initial attachment was warranted because the applicant had demonstrated a credible claim for money owed and had sufficient reason to fear that the assets of the respondent would be concealed or dissipated before the claim could be legally enforced, thereby upholding the attachment order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Attachment Order Validity: The appellant, who was the respondent in the attachment proceedings, challenged the decision that upheld the attachment obtained by the applicant. The court reasoned that the initial attachment was warranted because the applicant had demonstrated a credible claim for money owed and had sufficient reason to fear that the assets of the respondent would be concealed or dissipated before the claim could be legally enforced, thereby upholding the attachment order.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura di sequestro validità del sequestro mandato d'arresto sequestro di beni assegno all'ordine impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio Arrest/Arresteinsprache | Arrest
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 209
Appeal of Attachment Order Validity
BEK 2018 41
Attachment Order Dispute Appeal
BEK 2021 100
Appeal of Attachment Ruling Upheld
BEK 2022 116
Appeal of Provisional Attachment Order
BEK 2017 147
Appeal Regarding Attachment and Provisional Measures

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 11. März 2020 \n BEK 2019 179 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________ AG, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Arrest/Arresteinsprache |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 14. Oktober 2019, ZES 2019 388);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: