Appeal Inadmissibility in Provisional Execution Authorization Pending Underlying Enforcement Appeal
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA party appealed a lower court's decision regarding provisional authorization for execution (provisorische Rechtsöffnung), which had been sought against them. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appeal against the decision granting provisional execution was inadmissible because the underlying appeal against the initial enforcement order was already pending and had not yet been ruled upon, as only a non-final decision had been issued concerning the merits of the underlying opposition to the enforcement order.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Inadmissibility in Provisional Execution Authorization Pending Underlying Enforcement Appeal: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appeal against the decision granting provisional execution was inadmissible because the underlying appeal against the initial enforcement order was already pending and had not yet been ruled upon, as only a non-final decision had been issued concerning the merits of the underlying opposition to the enforcement order.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 19. Dezember 2019 \n BEK 2019 172 \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin D.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 27. September 2019, ZES 2019 410);-
\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: