Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2019 171 • KG SZ BEK 2019 171 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order

Numero d'incarto BEK 2019 171
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual, the accused and appellant, challenged a decision by a single judge to uphold their pre-trial detention. The appellant argued against continued detention, which was initially ordered following criminal proceedings initiated by the public prosecutor's office. The appellate court reviewed the decision on the detention order, considering the necessity of continued custody, ultimately deciding whether the grounds for the initial detention order remained valid and justified under the relevant procedural laws concerning coercive measures.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order: The appellant argued against continued detention, which was initially ordered following criminal proceedings initiated by the public prosecutor's office. The appellate court reviewed the decision on the detention order, considering the necessity of continued custody, ultimately deciding whether the grounds for the initial detention order remained valid and justified under the relevant procedural laws concerning coercive measures.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
carcerazione preventiva decisioni incidentali motivi validi impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio ragione di polizia motivo di revisione Untersuchungshaft | Zwangsmassnahmen/Haft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2017 174
Appeal of Pre-Trial Detention Order
BEK 2020 97
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order Upheld
BEK 2025 125
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order
BEK 2025 30
Appeal Against Extension of Pre-Trial Detention
BEK 2021 37
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 24. Oktober 2019 \n BEK 2019 171 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Untersuchungshaft |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Zwangsmassnahmengericht vom 2. Oktober 2019, ZME 2019 111);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: