Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2019 163 • KG SZ BEK 2019 163 Generato dall'IA

Complainant Appeals Dismissal Costs Allocation

Numero d'incarto BEK 2019 163
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private complainant appealed a public prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings, specifically challenging the allocation of costs and compensation following the dismissal. The court reasoned that because the continuation of the criminal proceedings was not unwarranted based on the initial facts presented by the complainant, the complainant was responsible for the costs incurred, and the prior decision regarding costs and compensation was upheld.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Complainant Appeals Dismissal Costs Allocation: The court reasoned that because the continuation of the criminal proceedings was not unwarranted based on the initial facts presented by the complainant, the complainant was responsible for the costs incurred, and the prior decision regarding costs and compensation was upheld.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ripartizione delle spese ricusazione del pubblico ministero licenziamento abusivo stralcio del procedimento anticipo delle spese azione civile
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 4. November 2019 \n BEK 2019 163 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, 2. C.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (Kostenauflage und Entschädigung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft des Bezirks March vom 9. September 2019, SUM 2018 867);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: